In the final weeks of California’s 2026 legislative session, lawmakers passed a series of bills that stand to significantly reshape the state’s privacy and AI regulatory landscape. Of particular significance, Senate Bill 690 (SB 690) seeks to curtail one of the principal theories underlying the recent wave of California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA) litigation, which has swept across diverse industries to affect website operators ranging from consumer brands to financial services firms. The bill would eliminate private actions under CIPA’s pen register and trap-and-trace provision, leaving the California Attorney General as the sole party authorized to bring those civil claims. If enacted, SB 690 would also apply retroactively to any pending pen/trap claim in actions filed within two years before its operative date, potentially affecting certain website-tracking cases already in litigation.
Continue Reading California Legislature Advances Key Privacy and AI Bills, Including Limits on Website Tracking LawsuitsData Privacy
Connecticut Enacts Sweeping AI Law Covering Employment, Healthcare, and Online Safety
On June 2, 2026, Connecticut Governor Ned Lamont signed Senate Bill 5 into law, designated as Public Act 26-15 and also known as the Connecticut Artificial Intelligence Responsibility and Transparency Act (the “CART Act” or “Act”).1 The CART Act is among the most comprehensive state AI laws enacted to date, creating distinct obligations for employment-related automated decision tools, consumer chatbots, frontier-model developers, generative-AI provenance, and online platforms used by minors, while also addressing AI applications in healthcare through targeted carveouts and innovation initiatives.
Continue Reading Connecticut Enacts Sweeping AI Law Covering Employment, Healthcare, and Online SafetySupreme Court Reinforces Donor Privacy Protections, Permitting Immediate Federal Court Challenge to State Subpoena
On April 29, 2026, the United States Supreme Court issued a unanimous opinion in First Choice Women’s Resource Centers, Inc. v. Davenport, where it held that a nonprofit suffered an injury to its First Amendment right of association when it was subpoenaed by a state attorney general to produce donor information, including donor identities.1 Justice Gorsuch, writing for the Court, held that the nonprofit petitioner could challenge the subpoena in federal court without first waiting for a state court to compel compliance.
Continue Reading Supreme Court Reinforces Donor Privacy Protections, Permitting Immediate Federal Court Challenge to State SubpoenaUnwrapping 2024’s Key Trends in Data Privacy Litigation
Data breaches made headlines throughout 2024, affecting governments, health care groups, and telecoms. Follow-on litigation has kept pace. Nearly 4,000 class actions involving data privacy issues are estimated to be filed in federal courts by the end of this year.
Growth in litigation meant that 2024 saw legal developments in several areas including standing to sue and web video suits. Increased attention on cybersecurity and privacy incidents unsurprisingly corresponded with active SEC enforcement and derivative suits related to inadequate data security.
Continue Reading Unwrapping 2024’s Key Trends in Data Privacy Litigation